| Tell A Friend! | ALERT / Suggestions | High Risk Pregnancy | Follow Ups | Post Followup |
Re: Another question on ventriculomegaly
Posted by fishdoc on 10:39 4/2/2007:
In Reply to: Re: Another question on ventriculomegaly posted by Bill Cusick MD on 08:43 4/2/2007:
Thanks Dr. Cusick. And I promise no more questions after this!
But - when you say "the minimal clinical significance of mild VM is more often associated when detected at 18-22 weeks vs 36-38 weeks gestation" - that sounds like you are saying 2d trimester Vm is LESS significant than later VM, but I think it is the opposite, true?
Again - last question!
D
Follow Ups:
| Tell A Friend! | ALERT / Suggestions | High Risk Pregnancy | Follow Ups | Post Followup |
Copyright © 2007, INCIID, inc.